Nuwe resepte

Fox Radio-gasheer Todd Starnes sê Chick-fil-A is die 'amptelike hoender van Jesus'

Fox Radio-gasheer Todd Starnes sê Chick-fil-A is die 'amptelike hoender van Jesus'


Dit is 'n redelike groot aanvaarding, Todd

Chick-fil-A het blykbaar 'n redelik belangrike nommer een-fan.

In die begin van 'n lang preek oor sy fundamentalistiese waardes, het Fox News Radio-gasheer Todd Starnes daarin geslaag om 'n kragtige boodskap oor Chick-fil-A en sy goddelike status te deel.

"Chick-fil-A ... is die amptelike hoender van Jesus, volgens die Baptiste se geloof en boodskap," vertel Starnes aan 'n skaterlaggende skare. Daarna verdiep hy hom in 'n toespraak oor die belangrikheid om op te staan ​​vir 'n tradisionele huwelik en sê: 'Die Hooggeregshof het moontlik die huwelik herdefinieer, maar God het niks herdefinieer nie.'

Vir wat dit werd is, hoewel Dan Cathy, uitvoerende hoof van Chick-fil-A inderdaad sy steun vir die tradisionele huwelik uitgespreek het, het hy later ook spyt uitgespreek oor die gebruik van sy onderneming as 'n manier om sy persoonlike sienings te deel.

'Ek gaan dit aan politici en ander oorlaat om sosiale kwessies te bespreek,' het Cathy vroeër vanjaar in 'n onderhoud gesê.

Intussen gebeur dit so dat Dinsdag 14 Julie Koei-waarderingsdag in Chick-fil-A is, en die restaurantketting vier fees deur 'n gratis maaltyd te bied aan almal wat in 'n koeikostuum opdaag.


Todd Starnes se kranksinnige anti-gay preek: 'The Cultural Curging Of The Dukes Of Hazzard' is 'n waarskuwing

Die radio-gasheer van Fox News, Todd Starnes, het die naweek 'n preek gelewer waarin Christene aangemoedig word om terug te veg teen huwelik van dieselfde geslag en transgender-gelykheid.

Starnes het Sondag met die Abilene Baptist Church in Augusta gepraat en gesê dat dit goed is om terug te wees in die Suide, waar dit maklik is om Waffle House en Chick-fil-A-restaurante te vind, wat volgens hom 'die amptelike hoender van Jesus' was. "

'Ek glo die rede waarom God Amerika geseën het, is omdat ons weet hoe om 'n varkboud te rook,' het Starnes gesê en wend hom tot die onlangse uitspraak van die Hooggeregshof wat die huwelik van dieselfde geslag effektief gewettig het.

"Daar is 'n oorlog teen godsdiensvryheid!" skree hy. "En hierdie oorlog is nie gerig op mense van die Moslem -geloof of die Joodse geloof of die Hindoe -geloof nie. Hierdie oorlog teen godsdiensvryheid is gerig op mense van die Christelike geloof."

Starnes onthou "'n voorval waarby twerking betrokke was. Miley Cyrus pleeg hierdie daad van openbare losbandigheid."

'En dit was omtrent daardie tyd dat Phil Robertson, een van my geloofshelde uit die Duck Dynasty, 'n onderhoud met GQ tydskrif, en in daardie onderhoud verdedig Phil Robertson die tradisionele huwelik, "het die Fox -gasheer gesê.

Volgens Starnes sou die regering binne 'n paar kort jare die Christelike oortuigings begin kriminaliseer.

"God het niks herdefinieer nie!" roep hy uit die gemeente tot 'Amens'. 'As u dink dat die kulturele suiwering van die Dukes of Hazzard die afgelope dae asemrowend was, wag totdat u sien wat hulle aan Christene gaan doen.'

Starnes was veral woedend oor die feit dat kinders in Oregon geleer word oor geslagsgelykheid.

'Dat daar nie iets soos 'n man of 'n vrou is nie,' het hy gesê. 'Dat u soos 'n seuntjie kan wakker word, maar teen die derde periode kan u soos 'n meisie begin voel!'

"Die tyd het aangebreek dat ons almal met een stem saamstaan!" Starnes dring daarop aan. "Hulle eis miskien om die inhoud van ons gebede te ken, hulle probeer om ons bakkerye af te sluit, hulle probeer ons stemme stilmaak, maar ons sal nie stilgemaak word nie! Ons sal nie geïntimideer word nie!"


Fox Radio-gasheer Todd Starnes sê Chick-fil-A is die 'amptelike hoender van Jesus'-resepte

deur P. David Gardner

In 'n verstommende erkenning van 'n gebrek aan 'n samehangende sin, het 'n radio-gasheer van Fox News verklaar dat Chick-fil-A nou en vir altyd 'die amptelike hoender van Jesus' is.

Todd Starnes, 'n meer as effens onbeskaamde man, het die afgelope naweek 'n ongekende verkondiging aan 'n verheugde gehoor by die Abeline Baptist Church in Agusta, GA afgelê. In wat begin het as 'n vurige strydkreet teen huwelik van dieselfde geslag en transgender-gelykheid, het Starnes met hierdie juweel begin en gesê dat dit wonderlik was om terug te wees in die magtige Suide, waar dit blykbaar redelik maklik was om 'n hoë-cholesterol-koers te vind Waffle House en Chick-fil-A restaurante, waarvan hy laasgenoemde verklaar het, was Jesus se amptelike keuse van hoender.

Klaarblyklik is Chick-fil-A voor die goeie ou dae toe selfs die wulpse keiser Caligula sy bloedstormende heerskappy oor die Romeinse Ryk in 37-41 nC begin het, ten minste volgens Starnes, dit wil sê.

Benewens gays en transgenders, het Starnes ook aangekondig dat die Amerikaanse regering binne 'n paar kort jaar begin om Christene te vervolg en hul oortuigings te kriminaliseer.

En hy het veral aandag geskenk aan die feit dat Oregon -studente onderrig word in geslagsgelykheid.

"Die tyd het aangebreek dat ons almal met een stem saamstaan!" Starnes loer. 'Hulle eis miskien om die inhoud van ons gebede te ken, hulle probeer ons bakkerye stop, hulle probeer ons stemme stilmaak, maar ons sal nie stilgemaak word nie! Ons sal nie geïntimideer word nie! ”


Fox Radio-gasheer Todd Starnes sê Chick-fil-A is die 'amptelike hoender van Jesus'-resepte

Ek het die volgende artikel op Fox News aanlyn gevind en besluit om dit hier te plaas. Toe ek propaganda en logiese dwalinge bestudeer terwyl ek kyk hoe Ron Hubbard mense met retoriek beïnvloed, het ek redelik vinnig besef dat Fox News redelik konsekwent is en gereeld onetiese propaganda -tegnieke gebruik, insluitend leuens. En ek bedoel nie dinge wat nie met my ideologie of 'n meer betroubare bron saamstem nie. Ek bedoel om een ​​ding op Fox te sê, dan sê HULLE dit nooit. Maar video kan en kan maklik bewys dat hulle wettig lieg. As die volgende artikel nie geskryf is nie, sou ek waarskynlik self 'n minder volledige artikel geskryf het.

Propaganda siklus
Geplaas deur Heather Hogan
Die presidensiële primêre seisoen van 2016 is in volle swang, wat onder meer beteken dat Fox News ’ -graderings die hoogte inskiet. Fox News is al 12 jaar agtereenvolgens die mees bekykde kabelnuusnetwerk in die land, en het gereeld meer kykers as CNN en MSNBC saamgetrek. Tydens die eerste Republikeinse primêre debat van hierdie seisoen het Fox die meeste kykers ooit (24 miljoen) gekyk, wat die twee uur lange vertoning gemaak het tot die hoogste gegradeerde nie-sportkabel-uitsending van alle tye.

Gedurende die afgelope tien jaar het almal wat ek ken 'n vriend of familielid of mentor aan Fox News verloor. Net soos ek, het hulle hulpeloos gekyk hoe mense wat hulle liefhet, deel geword het van die konserwatiewe kleinveekudde en mettertyd hul deernis vir paranoia verruil het vir hulle deurdagte opinies vir vervaardigde verontwaardiging en hul empatie vir haatlike retoriek. Hierdie mense, hierdie mammas en pappas en tantes en ooms en grootouers en broers en susters en pastore en politici en vriende, is mislei om te glo dat Fox News en Fox-goedgekeurde praatradiogashere die enigste kommentaar lewer wat hulle kan vertrou .

Wat hierdie mense wat ons so dierbaar is, nie verstaan ​​nie, is dat Fox News nie net belangstel om eerlik en gebalanseerd te wees nie, maar ook nie daarin belangstel om 'n betroubare bron van nuus te wees nie. Dit is omdat Fox News 'n nulsom politieke spel speel waarin elke groot nuusberig 'n geleentheid is om hul kykers as pionne te gebruik om die mag en agenda van die mees ekstremistiese ideologie van die Republikeinse Party te bevorder.

Oorweeg Trayvon Martin. Nadat hy deur George Zimmerman vermoor is, het verskeie joernaliste daarop gewys dat Fox News vreemd stil was oor die onderwerp. Totdat hulle 'n goeie idee gehad het van hoe hulle die verhaal tot hul voordeel kon vorm, het hulle geweier om daaroor verslag te doen. Toe Eric Boehlert, senior mede -medewerker van Media Matters, verduidelik: Obama het dit aangespreek, en sodra Obama die gesprek oor ras aangaan, weet jy, [Fox News] het van nul na honderd gegaan en besluit dat die verhaal partydig was, en dat die ondersteuning van Trayvon Martin die Demokratiese standpunt was; die man wat 'n ongewapende tiener vermoor het, was die Republikeinse konserwatiewe standpunt, en daarom het hulle die merkers opgestel en daarvoor gegaan. ”

Toe 'n groot jurie besluit om Darren Wilson nie aan te kla vir die moord op Michael Brown nie, het Sean Hannity bewys dat Boehlert beweer het. Hannity was feitlik gierig toe hy aan sy gehoor bekend maak: “Zero for three, a three-time loser! President Obama oor hoëprofielsake. ”

Studie na studie na studie na studie het getoon dat Fox News -kykers die mees oningeligte en verkeerd ingeligte mense in Amerika is. Een onlangse studie het selfs bevind dat mense wat glad nie na nuusprogramme gekyk het nie, 'n beter begrip van die werklikheid van die huidige gebeure gehad het as diegene wat net na Fox News gekyk het.

In plaas daarvan om by enige soort joernalistieke standaard te hou by die nuusberig, of — soos die geval is met liberaal-leunende MSNBC — wat eerlik oor die nuus berig en ideologiese kommentaar lewer wat op feite gebaseer is, begin Fox News met hul einddoel in gedagte en werk agteruit. Hoe kan 'n nuusverhaal gebruik word om hul kykers en persepsies van president Obama of die Demokratiese Party te beskadig? Hoe kan 'n nuusverhaal gebruik word om Republikeinse politici te versterk, of om die oorsake van republikeinse beleide beïnvloeders soos die National Rifle Association of evangeliese Christene te bevorder? Hoe kan 'n nuusverhaal gebruik word om die oorsake van progressiewe Amerikaners te verdoesel?

Sodra hulle besluit het oor die gewenste uitkoms, vorm Fox News die vertelling en begin sy breinspoeling.

Fox News se gebruik van propaganda om sy kykers te isoleer en te indoktrineer, is doelbewus en ontsettend effektief. Dit gedy voort uit vreesgebaseerde seksisme, rassisme, homofobie, xenofobie en dogmatiese onverdraagsaamheid teenoor almal wat nie 'n reguit, wit Christen is nie.

Die Fox News Propaganda Cycle

Ek bestudeer Fox News ’ -metodologie sedert 2004, toe ek sien hoe iemand vir wie ek lief is, vir die eerste keer in hul wentelbaan getrek word. Hierdie artikel is die hoogtepunt van al my navorsing. Hieronder sien u 'n grafiek wat ek gemaak het met 'n uiteensetting van die manier waarop Fox News en hul radio -eweknieë klassieke propaganda -tegnieke gebruik om hul kykers/luisteraars te isoleer en te indoktrineer. En daaronder vind u 'n verduideliking van elke tegniek, asook voorbeelde van hoe hierdie metodes in aksie lyk. Daar is duisende voorbeelde om uit te kies. Ek het net 'n handjievol gekies.

As u die nasionale liberale media dwingend namens u laat werk het, is dit baie moeilik om deur die geraas na die werklikheid te breek. ” – Lou Dobbs, November 2012

Die liberale elite ” is 'n konsep wat deur Richard Nixon se veldtog geskep is tydens sy bod om presidentskap in 1960. Feministe wat pleit vir swart mense wat werk om rassistiese geweld, segregasie en wette teen interrassige huwelike te beëindig en teenoorlogse betogers wat moeg was vir die oorlog in Viëtnam, het wit mans onrustig gemaak, en daarom het die Nixon-veldtog daardie aktiviste en hul simpatiseerders begin merk as die liberale elite. , en die “liberale elite ” was 'n bedreiging vir 'n tradisionele, deur God goedgekeurde, deur die stigter vaders gesanksioneerde lewenswyse.

Fox News het die strategie van Nixon ’s afgeskakel en dit met groot sukses uitgebrei.

Die skep van 'n valse tweedeling is 'n propaganda -tegniek wat gebruik word om ingewikkelde kwessies te vereenvoudig en mense te dwing om te glo dat hulle 'n óf/óf keuse het. Die groep wat die valse tweedeling skep, weet dat daar baie keuses beskikbaar is, maar om hul boodskap suksesvol te maak, moet hulle luisteraars oortuig dat hul keuses beperk is. Fox News en sy radio -eweknieë posisioneer hulle nie net teen MSNBC nie, hulle posisioneer hulle teen letterlik elke ander inligtingsbron. Jy kan die goeie ou kies, of jy kan die slegte ou kies. U kan u nuus kry by Fox en Fox-goedgekeurde praatradio-gashere (ware patriotte wat die land probeer red), of u kan u nuus kry van die liberale media (bedrieglike of waanvoorspelers wat die land probeer vernietig).

Die handhawing van 'n valse tweespalt is noodsaaklik vir Fox News. As hul kykers inligting of ontleding van enige ander groep ontvang, ongeag hoe polities of onpartydig die groep is, sal kykers gedwing word om die verkeerde inligting wat deur Fox News op hulle afgedruk word, te konfronteer.

Ad nauseam is 'n propaganda -taktiek wat die herhaling van 'n frase of idee herhaaldelik herhaal totdat 'n gehoor dit as 'n feit begin aanvaar. Fox News gebruik die ad nauseam -tegniek in elke stap van hul propagandasiklus, maar dit is die belangrikste in die isolasiefase, omdat dit die doeltreffendste is as 'n kyker/luisteraar se mediabronne beperk is. Nadat die valse tweespalt tussen Fox en elke ander nuusbron geskep is, verag Fox -kenners die “liberale media ” of “ mainstream media ” met meedoënlose ywer. Politieke oorwinnings wat nie met konserwatiewe ideologie strook nie, word veroorsaak deur die bose liberale media. Almal wat Fox News bevraagteken, is deel van die leuenagtige liberale media. As u iets op die internet gelees het wat u aan Fox News laat twyfel het, is dit omdat die internet beheer word deur die manipulerende liberale media.

Uur na uur, dag na dag, gebruik Fox die frases “liberal media ” en “ mainstream media ” om die valse tweespalt wat Fox -kykers isoleer van die werklikheid voortdurend te versterk.

Bevestigingsvooroordeel en kognitiewe dissonansie

As 'n persoon eers op 'n kernoortuiging besluit het, sal hy waarskynlik inligting soek wat die oortuiging bevestig en inligting vermy wat dit uitdaag. Dit is ook meer geneig om getuienis te buig om in die paradigma van hul oortuiging te pas, as om hul oortuiging te verander om te pas by bewyse wat daarop dui dat hul oortuiging verkeerd is. Die praktyk om slegs inligting te aanvaar wat iets bevestig wat u reeds glo, terwyl u enige inligting wat die geloof uitdaag, verwerp, word bevestigingsvooroordeel genoem. Om kernoortuigings uit te daag, veroorsaak kognitiewe dissonansie.

Een van die hoofredes waarom Fox News so effektief is om kognitiewe dissonansie te gebruik om mense van ander nuusbronne weg te hou, is dat Fox hom strategies met die evangeliese Christendom verbind het. Dus, as een van die Fox News -leerstellings in twyfel getrek word, word Fox self in twyfel getrek en as Fox sinoniem is met God se politiek, word die politiek van God in twyfel getrek en as die politiek van God in twyfel getrek word , Word God in twyfel getrek. Daarom word elke uitdaging aan Fox omskryf as 'n aanval op God self.

Om kognitiewe dissonansie te skep deur jouself as die ware bondgenoot en woordvoerder van God te stel, is een van die kragtigste propagandategnieke van alle tye. Dit werk op nasionale skaal vir fasciste en werk vir kultusleiers wat uit skure werk. Dit is veral oortuigend in die Verenigde State, waar ons oortuiging dat ons God se uitverkore mense is, metodies in ons nasionale identiteit ingeweef is sedert John Winthrop in 1630 sy “City on a Hill ” -toespraak gelewer het, voordat hy ooit sy voete neergesit het hierdie kontinent.

+ Fox News-radiogasheer Todd Starnes noem die berugte anti-LGBT-restaurant Chick-Fil-A “ die amptelike hoender van Jesus. ”
+ Bill O ’Reilly veg 'n denkbeeldige oorlog om die viering van Kersfees te behou.
+ Toe die Duck Dynasty-ster Phil Robertson sy nou berugte homofobiese tirade in GQ ondergaan het, het Sean Hannity die opmerkings van Robertson genoem en die tradisionele Christelike sentiment en waardes gevorm. Erick Erickson het gesê dat Robertson openlik oor sy Christelike geloof gepraat het . Omdat hy 'n sekulêre linkser in die oorlog met die ortodokse Christendom beledig het, moet hy gestraf word. ” En Jim Pinkerton het sy skorsing uit die program ontbied en 'n suiwering van die suidelike wit Christelike patriotiese kultuur uit die TV. ”
Skep vyand

Die dae dat [minderhede] geen mag het nie, is verby en hulle is kwaad. En hulle wil hul krag as vergelding gebruik. ” – Rush Limbaugh, Junie 2009

Dit is die nuwe Amerika, dit is nie jou vader se Amerika nie. ” – Dick Morris, November 2012

Die belangrikste komponent van die handhawing van 'n wêreld wat op propaganda gebou is, is die skep van 'n vyand wat uitgesluit is van 'n groep. As gevolg van die konsep van Nixon oor tradisionele Amerikaners, het Fox 'n beeld van sy groep (vir sy groep) gekweek as mense wat God liefhet, wat hul gesinne liefhet en wat hul land liefhet. Sodra die parameters van die in-groep vasgestel is, begin die proses van andersing. Deur gebruik te maak van bestaande oortuigings, beelde en negatiewe stereotipes, word 'n buite-groep gevorm. In die geval van Fox stem hierdie buite-groep weer ooreen met die definisie van Nixon van die “liberal elite ”: mense wat die onderdrukking van die gevestigde magstruktuur uitdaag.

As die vyand eers geskep is, hoef u nie op logika te appelleer nie. In haar fantastiese boek Enemy Images in War Propaganda verduidelik Marja Vuorinen dat mense geneig is om aan hulself en hul groepe te dink dat hulle alle eienskappe van goeie deug besit (eerlikheid, geregtigheid, reinheid, goeie maniere, harde werk, regte godsdiens en #8221), en in 'n poging om die brose selfbeeld te behou, projekteer mense die teenoorgestelde eienskappe (“ kwaad, onwaar, gekook, lui, bygelowig, barbaars ”) op groepe mense wat nie soos hulle is nie. Fox is verslawend, nie net omdat dit 'n spesifieke ideologie voed nie, maar ook omdat dit daagliks gerusstel dat Fox -kykers God se goeie ouens is deur te herhaal dat die “liberal elite ” die slegte ouens is.

Om te projekteer/omdraai, is bloot om iemand anders valslik daarvan te beskuldig dat hy/sy die ding doen/wees. Hierdie tegnieke is gunstelinge van Fox News. Hulle word gebruik in elke stap van Fox ’ se propagandasiklus, maar hulle is veral effektief om vyande te skep.

+ Op 'n November 2012-episode van The O ’Reilly Factor, die berugte boelie Bill O ’Reilly het oneerlike mediakultuur gemors en “vicious ” mense van die uiterste linkerkant gesê: “ Daar is hele mediabedrywighede wat slegs bestaan ​​om te bevorder ideologie, dit is duidelik 'n slegte situasie wat al hoe erger word. Hy beskryf homself en Fox -nuus met kommerwekkende duidelikheid, maar beskuldig eerder die “liberale media en#8221 van sy misdade.
+ In Mei 2012 is president Obama op The View gevra of hy verwag dat die presidentsverkiesing naby sal wees. Hy het geantwoord: "As u naam Barack Obama is, is dit altyd styf." President Obama verwys na die taktiek wat konserwatiewe kenners hom as 'n nie-Amerikaner met simpatie en bande met radikale terroriste-groepe in die Midde-Ooste gebruik het. Die middag het Fox, gereeld, by Monica Crowley, die president, gebel en gesê dat baie Amerikaners hom deur 'n rassistiese lens beskou. Dit is in 'n neutedop: as 'n slagoffer u uitroep oor u grootpratery en u stel voor dat hulle die grootmens is en dat u die slagoffer is.
+ Glenn Beck —, wat 'n lang geskiedenis het van rassistiese retoriek teen swart mense, Moslems en werklose mense en#8212 beskuldig president Obama daarvan dat hy 'n diepgewortelde haat vir wit mense of die blanke kultuur gehad het. 8221
Karaktermoord

Karaktermoord is 'n propaganda -tegniek wat gebruik word om 'n persoon, eerder as 'n idee, aan te val deur hulle te diskrediteer, te belaster, te demoniseer of te ontmenslik. Fox News gebruik nie net karaktermoord teen liberale politici en organisasies nie, maar ook karaktermoord teen onskuldige mense wat betrokke is by tragedies wat katalisators kan wees vir progressiewe veranderinge, soos groter gelykheid vir rasseminderhede of wapenbeheer. Byvoorbeeld, Fox News het dit 'n algemene gebruik gemaak om helde te skep uit die rassistiese wit mans wat onskuldige swart tieners vermoor.

+ Toe Trayvon Martin deur George Zimmerman vermoor is, het die Fox News -gas, Doug Burns, gesê: 'Ek weet almal hou sarkasties aan oor die Skittles. U kan waarskynlik iemand met Skittles doodmaak. Die ding is, ja, jy draai baie hipoteties om. En jy kan 'n bottel ystee breek, regs, met die skerp rand, en jy kan iemand daarmee doodmaak. ” Geraldo Rivera het volgehou dat Martin ’s “hoodie net so verantwoordelik is vir [sy] dood as George Zimmerman was. ” Daarna het hy voortgegaan om 'n dreigende prentjie van die ongewapende tiener te skets en die besluit van Zimmerman te verdedig om hom dood te maak.
+ Nadat Eric Garner vermoor is deur die polisie in New York, wat 'n onwettige verstikking op hom gebruik het, het Fox News baie moeite gedoen om sy moord op Garner self te blameer. Die verslag van die lykskouings verklaar dat Garner gesterf het as gevolg van druk in die nek (verstikking), kompressie van die bors en 'n geneigde posisie tydens fisiese terughoudendheid deur die polisie. vir sy dood, het hy geglo dat Garner dit teëkom omdat hy sigarette onwettig verkoop het, of ontken het dat hy selfs in 'n verstikking was.
+ Nadat die ongewapende swart tiener Michael Brown verskeie kere deur die beampte Darren Wilson geskiet is, het Fox News -gasheer herhaaldelik beweer dat Brown 'n slegte ou was, en 'n verhaal wat die ewige aanbieding van valse inligting insluit.
+ Toe Freddie Gray agter in 'n polisiebakkie in Baltimore dood is, het Bo Dietel, bydraer van Fox News, gesê: "Ek hoop net dat hulle toksikologie doen [op Grey]. Miskien was hy op dwelms. Toe Geraldo Rivera op die toneel in Baltimore aankom om die protesoptredes te dek, het hy gesê dit lyk asof inwoners op soek is na probleme. ”
Sondebok

Sondebokke is 'n propaganda -tegniek wat gebruik word om die skuld op 'n onskuldige groep of individu te plaas om die skuld weg te beweeg van die groep of individu wat verantwoordelik is vir die probleem, of om veralgemenings oor 'n groep mense te maak op grond van die optrede van 'n paar.

+ On The View in 2010, Bill O ’Reilly het gesê dat die rede waarom hy gekant is teen 'n moskee wat naby Ground Zero gebou word, was omdat: “ Moslems ons op 9-11 vermoor het. ”
+ Die idee vir 'n internasionale kultuursentrum in Manhattan word deur Bill Hemmer bespot as die eerste stop vir 'n radikale jihadis wat na Amerika kom en wil gaan bid. ”
+ Op The O ’Reilly Factor het Ann Coulter gesê dat as alle Moslems lugrederye sou boikot, ons heeltemal van die lughawensekuriteit kan ontslae raak. ”
+ Megyn Kelly: “Jesus was ook 'n wit man. ”
Beroep op vrees

Ek moet die ACLU kies, want hulle is tans die gevaarlikste organisasie in die Verenigde State van Amerika. Hulle verreweg. Daar is niemand eens naby dit nie. Hulle is, soos, tweede langs Al Qaeda. ” – Bill O ’Reilly, Junie 2004

Waarom is die Black Lives Matter -beweging nog nie as 'n haatgroep geklassifiseer nie? Ek bedoel, hoeveel te meer moet in hierdie rigting gaan voordat iemand dit werklik so noem? ” – Elizabeth Hasselbeck, Augustus 2015

Die skep van 'n klimaat van vrees is noodsaaklik vir alle propagandiste, en Fox News is geen uitsondering nie. Vrees is 'n primitiewe en dikwels irrasionele emosie, so boodskappe wat 'n beroep op vrees het, omseil die brein se logiese sentrum en beland reg in die hipotalamus, wat 'n persoon se veg-of-vlug-reaksie beheer. Soos ek hierbo genoem het, bevat Fox News ’ buite-groep almal wat nie 'n reguit blanke Christen is nie, dus is dit baie maklik vir die netwerk om hul kykers te ontgin en irrasionele vrese vir elke minderheidsgroep in Amerika. Die verhaal van wit viktimisering is 'n hoeksteen van die programmering van Fox News ’ (en Fox-aangrensende praatradiogashere). Die idee wat hulle laat voortleef, is dat die lewenswyse wat gekoester word deur hardwerkende, vreesbevange, Amerika-liefhebbende, eerste familie-konserwatiewes, voortdurend bedreig word deur minderheidsgroepe.

Die mediakundige/sosioloog David L. Altheide se boek, Creating Fear: News and the Construction of Crisis, wys daarop dat die armes, onteiende en mees onlangs franchise -dele van die samelewing buite verhouding met die grootste vreesaanvraag geassosieer word. 8221

Die mense wat Fox News ’ -boodskappe gebruik, doen dit in 'n voortdurende toestand van vrees, rede word vervang deur angs en die vermoë om logies te dink, gaan verlore.

Minderheid-aas is 'n propaganda tegniek wat gebruik word om te vang op vrees wat in andersheid gebaseer is. Fox News bereik dit deur die groot, onkundige oortuigings wat hul kykers gedurende hul lewens deur TV, films, boeke, advertensies, politieke veldtogte en Amerikaanse buitelandse beleidspropaganda ingeneem het, te herbevestig, wat 'n valse vertelling skep waarin die gestereotipeerde minderheid bedreig die Amerikaanse lewenswyse.

In die meesterwerk van Ian Haney López oor die taal van ras, Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded racial Appeals have racinvented and Wrecked the Middle Class, beskryf hy gekodeerde taal as woorde of frases wat rasse -angs veroorsaak en geloofwaardige ontkenning moontlik maak deur te skep taal waarmee die spreker kan ontken dat hy selfs oor ras dink. Een van Fox News se mees suksesvolle en veragtelike propagandataktieke dui altyd daarop dat mense wat oor ras praat die regte rassiste is, terwyl hulle gekodeerde rasseboodskappe metodies weef. in hul programmering. Hier is net 'n paar voorbeelde:

+ As Fox News praat oor “Staatregte, maak hulle 'n beroep op die taal wat as 'n gekodeerde rasse -appèl gebruik word tydens die Burgerregtebeweging wat state die reg gegee het om federale verpligte rasse -integrasie te ignoreer.
+ Die frase “ onwettige vreemdeling ” veroorsaak vrees dat immigrante misdadigers is wat die Amerikaanse lewenswyse wil ondermyn.
+ Frases soos “ Verdediger van die huwelik ” of “ verdediger van geloof ” word gebruik om voorstanders van LGBT -gelykheid te posisioneer as mense wat vasbeslote is om die huwelik te vernietig of geloof te vernietig.
+ Woorde soos “thug, ” “ghetto, ” en “hood ” word gewoond aan ander swart mense en hul kulturele uitdrukkings terwyl hulle gewelddadige beelde uit die popkultuur in gedagte hou.
Stereotipering

Stereotipering is 'n propaganda-tegniek waarin bestaande idees oor 'n rasse-, etniese of kulturele groep oordrewe word en veralgemenings maak wat gewoonlik diskriminasie en ongelykheid voortduur. Fox News -stereotipes deur gekodeerde taal te gebruik, ja, maar hulle stereotipeer ook deur dramatiese staaltjies in die plek van wetenskaplike bewyse aan te bied, geïsoleerde gebeurtenisse as tendense te bevorder, [en] kategorieë mense as gevaarlik uit te beeld. ”

+ As Fox News praat oor “welvaart ” en “ voedselstempels, ”, doen hulle dit met die onuitgesproke suggestie dat hierdie programme handel oor lui minderhede wat rykdom neem uit hardwerkende wit mense. Dieselfde met “entitlement Society. ”
+ Die frase “ swart-op-swart misdaad ” dui daarop dat swart mense inherent krimineel is en dat alle gewelddadige optrede teen hulle geregverdig is omdat wit mense hulself/hul gesin verdedig teen iemand wat, of waarskynlik sal wees, 'n misdadiger.
+ Na aanleiding van O ’Reilly ’s The View-voorkoms waartydens hy gesê het “ Moslems het ons doodgemaak op 9-11, ” Brian Kilmeade het hom op Fox & amp Friends verdedig deur te sê: “ Nie alle Moslems is terroriste nie, maar alle terroriste is Moslems. ”
Skep alternatiewe werklikheid

Terloops, wie het slawerny en Jim Crow beëindig? Christene. Eerwaarde Martin Luther King. Christene. Christenskap is die rede waarom ons vandag geen slawerny in die wêreld het nie. ” – Tucker Carlson, Februarie 2015

Waninligting versprei bloot vals inligting wat bedoel is om te mislei. Fox News lig sy kykers voortdurend verkeerd in. Ek sal 'n handvol voorbeelde hieronder noem met 'n aantekening oor watter van die voormelde propaganda -tegnieke die verkeerde inligting gebruik word. Daar is daagliks hele webwerwe wat toegewy is aan die regstelling van Fox News ’. Onthou dat Fox News -kykers hierdie leuens oorweldigend as onweerlegbare feite aanvaar.

+ In Maart 2010 het Fox & amp Friends se mede-anker, Gretchen Carlson, gesê dat die Texas Board of Education nuwe geskiedenisboeke oorweeg wat verwysings na sekere vakansiedae, Founding Fathers, the Constitution! Ek bedoel, geen verrassing daardie Kersfees nie, hulle wil daarvan ontslae raak omdat hulle dit die afgelope paar jaar al gedoen het, maar c ’mon, die Grondwet? ” Onwaar. (Isoleer kykers: naarheid, kognitiewe dissonansie.)
+ In Januarie 2014, op Fox & amp Friends, het Brian Kilmeade gesê dat Colorado -welsynsontvangers hul voordele in ATMS kan omskep, wat hulle sal doen om dagga te koop. Onwaar. (Beroep op vrees: minderheids-aas, gekodeerde taal, stereotipering.)
+ In April 2014 het Todd Starnes gesê dat liberale 'n Facebook -algoritme uitgedink het en dat alle mense wat op Facebook verbied word, op een of ander manier konserwatiewes is. ” Onwaar. (Isoleer kykers: valse tweespalt, ad nauseam. Skep 'n vyand: karaktermoord.)
+ In Februarie het The Five, mede-gasheer Dana Perions, gesê oor klimaatsverandering: die temperatuurmetings is gemaak en dit waai almal op in hul (wetenskaplikes) gesigte. ” Op dieselfde paneel het Kimberly Guilfoyle navorsing oor klimaatsverandering en bedrogwetenskap genoem. ” Klaarblyklik onwaar. (Net pure verkeerde inligting, net soos 72% van Fox News se bewerings oor klimaatsverandering.)
+ In September 2014 het Britt Hume gesê dat president Obama 'n veel groter mag stuur om Ebola in Wes -Afrikaanse lande te hanteer as met ISIS. Super onwaar. (Beroep op vrees: minderheidsgebaseerde, gekodeerde taal.)
+ En laat ons nie Birtherisme vergeet nie. In 2013 het 64 persent van die Republikeine steeds geglo dat president Obama nie in die Verenigde State gebore is nie. (Beroep op vrees: minderheids-aas, gekodeerde taal, stereotipering.)
Verwar

Die propaganda tegniek om mense doelbewus te verwar, is anders as verkeerde inligting. In plaas daarvan om leuens as feite aan te bied, word verwarring geïmplementeer deur doelbewus vae algemene voorstellings te maak, sodat die gehoor die leë boodskappe kan invul met die boodskappe wat hulle alreeds ontvang het oor mense wat alreeds anders is. Dit praat 'n idee met opsetlike dubbelsinnigheid om feite te verdoesel.

+ As ons kyk na die manier waarop Fox News en sy kykers na die verkiesing in 2012 in verskillende toestande van verbasing rondgeloop het, is dit die perfekte manier om dit te illustreer. In the build-up to election day, the math that lead multiple long-respected, nonpartisan polling organizations to forecast a win for President Obama was condemned by Fox News as “scientific gobbledygook,” “liberal media noise,” and “numbers that parrot the mainstream media.”

Rewriting history is simply lying about events that have already happened. It’s a type of misinformation in which the propagandists’ current opinions are justified by presenting an inaccurate view of the past.

+ After the 2012 presidential election, Fox News blamed President Obama’s campaign for many of the public perceptions about Mitt Romney that led to his defeat. However, it was Republican candidates who crafted those messages during the primary campaign season. Fox told its viewers President Obama was responsible for Americans believing the narrative that Romney “was a vulture, that he was a vampire,” a “Vulture Capitalist.” In fact, it was Rick Perry who coined the phrase and Newt Gingrich who continued to promote it. Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire who ultimately became one of Romney’s chief financial supporters, is the one who financed Gingrich’s now-infamous “King of Bain” attack documentary.
+ In an attempt to paint President Obama as soft on terrorism, Eric Bolling, co-host of the Fox News program The Five, said there were no terrorist attacks in America during President Bush’s time as president: “America was certainly safe between 2000 and 2008. I don’t remember any terrorist attacks on American soil during that period of time.” Not a single person on the panel pointed out that Bolling had either forgotten or was deliberately excluding 9/11, the most devastating terrorist attack in United States history. When Bolling was called out by basically every non-Fox new organization in the country, he said that he misspoke, but that the “radical liberal left” was “being petty” for expressing outrage over his lie.
+ In January 2013, Sean Hannity told Fox News viewers that there were 8.3 million fewer Americans working than when President Bush left office in 2008, which was completely untrue.
What kind of effects do we see when large numbers of people are consuming baseless propaganda under the impression that it’s news journalism? Well, a study conducted by Cambridge’s Journal of Politics found that all Americans — not just evangelical Christians or diehard Republicans — are susceptible to Fox News’ message. Democratic members of Congress became more sympathetic to Republican causes after being exposed to Fox News. Their hostility toward Mexican immigration increased, for example, as did their belief in inaccuracies about climate change and the Iraq war. Fox News deliberately misinforms its viewers about things like climate change to score political capital, and most scientists now believe the earth is on the brink of its sixth mass extinction. Fox News not only fosters a culture of terror and hate it also purposefully contributes to the destruction of the literal planet.

Though Fox News will deny it, one of the reasons Donald Trump has been so successful in Republican Primary polls is that he’s explicitly saying what Fox News has been using coded messages to say for the last decade. Fox has convinced their viewership that brown people are inherently criminal, and black people are inherently lazy, and gay people are in opposition to God, and women don’t deserve the same rights as men or control over their own bodies. It’s not surprising that when Trump bluntly gives voice to these opinions, many Republicans — the majority of whom consume Fox News at least weekly — support him. He is doing nothing more than parroting the message of Fox News with more directness. When two white dudes attack a homeless Latino man and pee on him, citing Donald Trump as their inspiration, that is a direct effect of Fox News propaganda cycle.

My goal with this article isn’t to ridicule people who watch Fox News my goal is to to make plain this deliberate, manipulative cycle Fox traps its viewers inside, so we can use our knowledge to begin to set our friends and family free.

Armed with these truths, maybe we won’t all feel so helpless during this election season.

In the original story several charts that help to support the author's positions appear. I recommend using the link to examine them if possible.

The point that other media also use propaganda is true, but should never be used to dismiss or not examine the claim specifically against Fox news. I have found other information that shows specific important examples of misrepresentation by Fox which I may elaborate on over time.

Here's a link to a video that shows reporters for Fox news clearly lying about their own actions.

Jon Stewart: Fox News' Poor-Shaming Is "Easily Provable And Decidedly True"
Stewart On Fox's Denial: How "Removed From Reality Is Fox's Perception Of Their Own Coverage On Poverty?"


BlatherWatch

As the Chick-fil-A controversy has fired up (the spare parts) of right wing talk by force feeding their hosts complementary product not-ready-for-the-sanitary-sewer-systems out there and the tattooed soccer moms and men dressed in baby clothes lined up in support of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Salem Radio's Mike Gallagher, encouraged his listener(s) to post images of them consuming Chick fil A on Facebook, while Salem itself encouraged a flash mob at the local C-f-A outlet at the Paramus NJ mall, where 200 people or the equilvalent of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie showed up.

  Former subway rider, now Chick fil A militia General Curtis Sliwa, seen interrogating pensioner lined up for Operation Fast and Furious Food

 Chick-fil-A' CEO, Dan Cathy who earlier last month stated he was 'guilty as charged' with his support of anti-gay organizations and later the 'safety recall' of Jim Henson kids toys from Chick-fil-A resturants daarna the Henson group (since 2004 owned by Disney) had already severed their ties with Cathy, has built his base around baby jesus-meets-NASCAR-guns-anti-gays-except-for-lesbian porn, stated previously:

"It's very clear in Romans chapter 1, if we look at society today, we see all the twisted up kind of stuff that's going on," Cathy states in the clip. "Washington trying to redefine the definition of marriage and all the other kinds of things that we go -- if you go upstream from that, in Romans chapter 1, you will see that because we have not acknowledged God and because we have not thanked God, that we have been left victim to the foolishness of our own thoughts."

While violating Leviticus and serving 'swine' as Chick fil A's product includes breakfast sandwiches with . bacon , Cathy's "Win Shape Foundation" contributed nearly $2 million to organizations such as Marriage & Family Foundation ($1,188,380), Exodus International ($1,000) and the Family Research Council (also $1,000) promoting only that hetrosexuals can feel misrable in marriage.

Another spare parts of radio, Pastor Kevin Swanson declared:

"They wondered if the Muppets support NAMBLA and if Kermit is "interested in another frog" instead of Miss Piggy and suggested that Chick-fil-A have a "frog fillet" or a "Miss Piggy on a bun" to memorialize the Muppets' decision to "take the sodomy route."

Fox News host Mike Huckabee declared August 1 to be "Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day" and asked his audience to eat at Chick-fil-A in order to "affirm a business that operates on Christian principles and whose executives are willing to take a stand for the Godly values we espouse."

Fox News Radio reporter Todd Starnes tweeted that "a Chick-fil-A sandwich" is the "best defense against anti-Christian, anti-Chicken, leftwing, heterophobic bigots."

Somehow a wholesome meal of chicken by-product will either keep the gay away or provides a comfort zone for those not ready to come out.   


Facebook admits ‘mistake’ in blocking Fox News Radio commentator

By Erik Wemple, Published: June 29, 2013 at 8:01 pmE-mail the writer Washington Post

Facebook (Paul Sakuma/Associated Press)

Anyone familiar with the work of Fox News Radio’s Todd Starnes would recognize the inspiration behind the thoughts that he recently posted on Facebook. They’re steeped in the events of recent weeks and express contempt for certain currents of opinion:

“I’m about as politically incorrect as you can get. I’m wearing an NRA ball cap, eating a Chick-fil-A sandwich, reading a Paula Deen cookbook and sipping a 20-ounce sweet tea while sitting in my Cracker Barrel rocking chair with the Gather Vocal Band singing ‘Jesus Saves’ on the stereo and a Gideon’s Bible in my pocket. Yes sir, I’m politically incorrect and happy as a June bug.”

According to Fox News Insider, that message got Starnes banned from Facebook. The site sent him this message: “We removed this from Facebook because it violates our Community Standards. So you’re temporarily blocked from using this feature.” A Facebook spokeswoman confirmed the blocking.

Those “Community Standards” are found right here. They outline 10 no-no areas for Facebook users: violence and threats, self-harm, bullying and harassment, hate speech, graphic content, nudity and pornography, identity and privacy, intellectual property, phishing and spam and security.

Unless Facebook covertly added another category — say, “conservative defiance” — The Erik Wemple Blog cannot ascertain which particular rule Starnes’s post defied. After all, the commentator didn’t say that he was sitting “naked in my Cracker Barrel rocking chair,” complete with photograph of the scene. That would have violated the “nudity and pornography” prohibition. Nor did Starnes publish secret Chick-fil-A recipes, which could have put him in contravention of the “intellectual property” provision. And hey, if his post looked like “hate speech,” well then our national dialogue is far less courteous than we thought.

Not that folks couldn’t take offense to what Starnes was saying — he was clearly thumbing his nose at the outrage over the racism scandal involving celebrity cook Paula Deen.

The displeasure of some Facebook users apparently worked its way to the site’s administrators. High-traffic pages commonly kick up what Facebook calls “reports” from users — essentially, complaints that a possible violation of the “Community Standards” may have occurred. Such “reports” appear to have triggered a look at Starnes’s post, then a block.

And later, after further review, Facebook realized it overstepped. From a Facebook spokeswoman:

“As our team processes hundreds of thousands of reports each week, we occasionally make a mistake. In this case, we mistakenly removed content from the Todd Starnes Page, and worked to rectify the mistake as soon as we were notified. We apologize for the inconvenience caused due to the removal of this content, and we have already taken steps to prevent this from happening in the future. Additionally, we have removed any blocks on associated accounts.”

The Facebook page of Starnes was blocked for “a few hours,” according to a Facebook spokeswoman. Starnes issued this tweet about the duration:

It looks like the Facebook ban is still in place for 9 more hours http://t.co/L4FkBfgfhd

— toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) June 29, 2013

Don’t get the wrong idea about the blocking, either. It’s merely an educational measure, says the Facebook spokeswoman:

Our temporary blocks are not intended to punish people who have broken the rules, but to put them in a ‘time out’ phase during which they are provided with educational materials that explain how to use Facebook in compliance with our community standards and statement of rights and responsibilities. These blocks are put into place to help our users better understand our policies and help prevent further misunderstanding of our Community Standards by our users.

The last time that the Erik Wemple Blog covered a Facebook action against a user was last October. In that case, a clever and politically motivated fellow posted a catchy anti-Obama meme that proved popular on the Internet. Facebook’s administration removed it, only to come to its senses later. It said this:

A member of our team accidentally removed something you posted on Facebook. This was mistake, and we sincerely apologize for this error. We’ve since restored the content, and you should now be able to see it.

The Erik Wemple Blog is not alleging a pattern here — merely pointing to similarities between two events.


Lawsuit: Soldier forced out of Army for serving Chick-fil-A, reading Hannity book

A member of the U.S. Army Band said he was forced out of the U.S. Army for having anti-Obama bumper stickers on his personal car, serving Chick-fil-A sandwiches at a party and reading books written by conservative authors like Sean Hannity, a federal lawsuit alleges.

Master Sergeant Nathan Sommers, a 25-year veteran of the military and a decorated soloist in the U.S. Army Band Chorus, claims he was forcibly retired from the Army due to his religious and conservative political beliefs. I first told you about Sommers last year in a series of exclusive Fox News reports.

Join Todd on Facebook for Conservative Conversation. Click here to join!

John Wells, an attorney representing Sommers, called him a “true hero” who lost his career while trying to stand up for his religious beliefs.” He alleges that he drew the ire of his superiors because of his belief in traditional marriage.

Master Sergeant Nathan Sommers, a 25-year veteran of the military and a decorated soloist in the U.S. Army Band Chorus, claims he was forcibly retired from the Army dues to his religious and conservative political beliefs. “Those who protect our rights must be allowed to exercise them,” said John Wells, an attorney representing Sommers. “Master Sergeant Sommers did nothing to interfere with good order and discipline. He was the perfect soldier.”

Sommers, who was based at Fort Myer in Washington, D.C., is the recipient of an Army commendation medal and was a soloist at the funeral of former First Lady Betty Ford.

The U.S. Army Band Chorus, known as “Pershing’s Own,” betrayed the core principles of the United States Army, Wells said.

“Congress has enacted laws to protect the free expression of religious beliefs in the armed forces,” Wells said. “The Army Band broke those laws and they will be held accountable.”

“I am certain that General ‘Black Jack’ Pershing, a true leader, is spinning in his grave at the actions taken by the organization that bears his name,” he added.

The lawsuit calls for Sommers to be returned to active duty service with full pay and benefits.

I reached to the military hoping they might shed some light on Sommers' allegations. But a spokesman said the Army does not comment on pending litigation.

Sommers first ran into trouble with his superiors when he put several anti-Obama bumper stickers on his car. The stickers read, “NOBAMA,” and “The Road to Bankruptcy is Paved with Ass-Fault.” That particular sticker included the image of a donkey. Sommers was ordered to remove the stickers, the lawsuit alleges.

“The Army took no action against those soldiers with pro-Obama bumper stickers,” Wells said.

Sommers was also criticized for reading books written by Sean Hannity, David Limbaugh and Mark Levin while in uniform. In one incident, he was backstage before a performance reading Limbaugh’s “The Great Destroyer” when a superior officer told him that he was causing “unit disruption” and was offending other soldiers.

“I wasn’t reading aloud,” Sommers told me. “I was just reading privately to myself. I was told they were frowning on that and they warned me that I should not be reading literature like that backstage because it was offensive.

It’s a good thing Sommers wasn’t caught reading my latest book, “God Less America.” He probably would’ve been tossed into a prison cell at Fort Leavenworth.

But the incident that really seemed to set off the chain of events that led to his forced retirement happened in 2012 and involved plump juicy chicken breasts.

Sommers decided to serve Chick-fil-A sandwiches at his promotion party – in honor of the repeal of "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell."

“In honor of DADT repeal, and Obama/Holder’s refusal to enforce DOMA act, I’m serving Chick-fil-A at my MSG promo reception for Army today,” he tweeted.

That tweet came under fire from his superior officers, according to an official military document.

“As a Soldier you must be cognizant of the fact that your statements can be perceived by the general public and other service members to be of a nature bordering on disrespect to the President of the United States,” the document stated.

Sommers told me he paid for the party with personal money, not government funds – and for the record – he served the sandwiches because his family likes to eat more chicken.

“I had no idea a Chick-fil-A sandwich would get me in trouble,” he said.

Wells said those incidents led to “trumped up charges” and Sommers was eventually given a sub-standard evaluation – which he immediately appealed.

On July 31 the Army’s Quality Management Panel ordered him discharged from the military.

Since Sommers had enough years on his record to retire, he was allowed to do so. The lawsuit was filed the next day.

“Just because someone joins the military, they do not give up their rights as a citizen,” Wells said.

“Unfortunately, in this world of political correctness, some Commanders believe they can force their will on subordinates.”

As I document extensively in my book, “God Less America,” there is a clear and present danger for Christians serving in the armed forces. This administration seems hell-bent on marginalizing Christianity and punishing Christians who refuse to stifle their beliefs.

Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary, heard on hundreds of radio stations. Sign up for his American Dispatch newsletter, be sure to join his Facebook page, and follow him on Twitter. His latest book is "God Less America."


BlatherWatch

As the Chick-fil-A controversy has fired up (the spare parts) of right wing talk by force feeding their hosts complementary product not-ready-for-the-sanitary-sewer-systems out there and the tattooed soccer moms and men dressed in baby clothes lined up in support of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Salem Radio's Mike Gallagher, encouraged his listener(s) to post images of them consuming Chick fil A on Facebook, while Salem itself encouraged a flash mob at the local C-f-A outlet at the Paramus NJ mall, where 200 people or the equilvalent of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie showed up.

  Former subway rider, now Chick fil A militia General Curtis Sliwa, seen interrogating pensioner lined up for Operation Fast and Furious Food

 Chick-fil-A' CEO, Dan Cathy who earlier last month stated he was 'guilty as charged' with his support of anti-gay organizations and later the 'safety recall' of Jim Henson kids toys from Chick-fil-A resturants daarna the Henson group (since 2004 owned by Disney) had already severed their ties with Cathy, has built his base around baby jesus-meets-NASCAR-guns-anti-gays-except-for-lesbian porn, stated previously:

"It's very clear in Romans chapter 1, if we look at society today, we see all the twisted up kind of stuff that's going on," Cathy states in the clip. "Washington trying to redefine the definition of marriage and all the other kinds of things that we go -- if you go upstream from that, in Romans chapter 1, you will see that because we have not acknowledged God and because we have not thanked God, that we have been left victim to the foolishness of our own thoughts."

While violating Leviticus and serving 'swine' as Chick fil A's product includes breakfast sandwiches with . bacon , Cathy's "Win Shape Foundation" contributed nearly $2 million to organizations such as Marriage & Family Foundation ($1,188,380), Exodus International ($1,000) and the Family Research Council (also $1,000) promoting only that hetrosexuals can feel misrable in marriage.

Another spare parts of radio, Pastor Kevin Swanson declared:

"They wondered if the Muppets support NAMBLA and if Kermit is "interested in another frog" instead of Miss Piggy and suggested that Chick-fil-A have a "frog fillet" or a "Miss Piggy on a bun" to memorialize the Muppets' decision to "take the sodomy route."

Fox News host Mike Huckabee declared August 1 to be "Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day" and asked his audience to eat at Chick-fil-A in order to "affirm a business that operates on Christian principles and whose executives are willing to take a stand for the Godly values we espouse."

Fox News Radio reporter Todd Starnes tweeted that "a Chick-fil-A sandwich" is the "best defense against anti-Christian, anti-Chicken, leftwing, heterophobic bigots."

Somehow a wholesome meal of chicken by-product will either keep the gay away or provides a comfort zone for those not ready to come out.   


The Immoral Minority

Okay so the other day I was poking fun at the Pillsbury dough boy here and his upcoming Christmas special, and I described his lineup as follows:

As you can see the program features a who's who from the "I have never heard of these people" list. And of course Sarah Palin, who is only a handful of years away from being added to that list.

So as all of you know I just say stuff. I really don't think that anybody is paying attention most of the time.

Especially the person who is the subject of my posts.

But this time I may have been wrong about that. Because as it turned out Palin herself may not have wanted to be included on a list of "I have never heard of these people."

So instead of flying out to the Fox News studio, Palin simply phoned it in. Literally.

Sarah Palin, phoning it in from Wasilla, Up-There-In-Alaska. Because Jesus might be the reason for the season, but he’s not reason enough to hop a plane to show up in person.

The other reason for the season, besides Jesus, is a reminder to buy Sarah Palin’s book about the “War on Christmas,” which apparently was inspired by none other than Todd Starnes and his coverage of those who would “take Christ out of Christmas” — by failing to buy Sarah’s book, we assume. (Wonkette also has the video.)

So to be clear not only did Palin NOT show up in person for the "special," but she also took up valuable airtime hawking last year's ghostwritten Christmas book that nobody bothered to buy in 2013.

Now I have to admit that I don't watch Christmas specials anymore, but my memory of them were that they had actual people who showed in person up to perform, like the Mandrell Sisters, Jose Feliciano, Johnny Mathis, Mariah Carey, and so on. All dressed up in suits and beautiful gowns to entertain the audience.

I simply cannot think of a single incident where a guest simply phoned in their appearance so that they could stay home in their pajamas and drink instead. Kan jy?

I think that indicates just how little Palin thought of Todd Starnes and his "Christmas special" jam packed with people nobody had every even fucking heard of.

And trust me, if you cannot even get Sarah Palin to show up at your event you have really sunk to a new low. That woman once showed up at a bowling alley trade show for fuck's sake, and yet she would not show up for this.

45 comments:

phoning in to a radio show, with all the announcements she'd be "on the show". Even Fox news did not put it on TV. lol

So. does that mean Fox news claimed their TV shit or what?
We know they didn't offer a private jet with bendy straws for her. LOLOLOLOL.
But why not use her equipment and show off her new tits unless. FOX news took their equipment back?
That would explain the cheesy ass video on her channel which is prob done on a Iphone. or whatEVERY the KOCKS are telling R's to use, used to be the crackberry but no more.
Did fox take their shit back or what?
Who knows?
Nancy? Brancy? PissyBrissy?Did big bad fox news steal your mom's equipment? :( Oh noes. and xmas also,too :
Is that why she is promoting a craptastic book that is well over a year old and selling for .01 on Amazon?
Happy Festivus to all :)

Oh, and MOLOTOV to all also, too.

I think, $he stood him up. Plain and simple. $he probably was supposed to be there like all the others (were there any guests at all on his show?), but pleaded with him to be able to call it in.

Starnes is a doughy, lunchy wannabe tough-guy pussy. He'd shit his pants if ever he was faced with the opportunity to "do the right thing," AK-47 or not in hand.

Here's another video from Baldy's Vlog Channel.
https://sarahpalinchannel.com/video/defending-the-heart-of-christmas-1405

In this one she's going off on those "angry atheist with lawyers". makes me think that some atheists has sued the shit out of Baldy and she can't let that shit go. Uh Gryphen you got something to tell is! LOL!!

Sarah's too busy living vibrantly to show up anywhere unless she can arrive in a stretch hummer with her entourage of drunken thugs. Thonghazi! Thonghazi! Thonghazi!

"Tawwwd! Tell those damn kids to put down the pipe, get their thongs on and get in the limo. WAIT! Ask Bristol if she's gone to the potty yet?"

Merry Christmas, Gryphen and all you IMers.

If I recall, she was still hawking book number one a year later as well..didn't she go 'on tour' with Bristol and HER lousy book about that time, and nobody showed up to see either of them at Mall of America? I'm sure a big corner of Todd's hanger is full of boxes of books the PAC bought and that Sarah is now trying to sell.
Happy Christmas, Sarah..may it be your final one as Grifter in Chief, USA.

Todd probably wasn't offering very much money, and he certainly wasn't paying for Sarah and Todd to fly in first class, stay in a five star hotel, order steaks from room service and maybe pad the bill with some clothes because, you know, the airlines always lose Sarah's luggage. No, the money that Todd offered Sarah was just enough to cover the cost of the phone call, reverse the charges.

If you don't want to watch the first 7 minutes of Todd's Super Duper Christmas special, and you want to get right to the Sarah interview, her fans at C4P have her 4 minute phone call up there.

Honest to goodness, Sarah said that Christmas is not just for Christians. It is also for those who, uh, just want to celebrate, have a holiday that they can unite around, and today, unfortunately, people feel that they have to be so politically correct.

Listen, Sarah. Christmas IS a holiday for CHRISTIANS TO CELEBRATE THE BIRTH OF CHRIST. People of other religions do not celebrate Christmas. It is not their holiday and it is not part of their religious faith. At this time of year, Jews celebrate Hanukkah, a completely different holiday which does not honor the birth of anyone. Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims-- none of them worship Christ as their god.

I know this is hard to accept, but there is an American holiday where people can get together with friends and/'or family and enjoy a swell meal together. That would be Thanksgiving. Instead of GETTING presents, that's a holiday for GIVING, as in GIVING THANKS. The origin of the holiday goes back before Christ was born when people gave thanks for a bountiful harvest. It is a holiday as old as agriculture when people depended on the sun, rain and good weather to provide enough food to get them through another year. Every religion has some kind of ritual where thanks is given, in the spring for another good harvest and in the fall thanks is given for that harvest. It is a celebration as old as mankind.

Meanwhile, Sarah wants to get the joy back in Christmas by putting Christ back in Christmas. Sarah, if you are a good Christian, you always have Christ in your heart. And, it is not your place to tell me how to worship or whether or not I should be worshiping at all. You go right ahead and keep Christ. No one has stolen him from you.

It's a pity that you don't have one specific wonderful Christmas moment to remember for those people listening-- it's almost like not knowing what books you read or what Supreme Court decisions Alaska people disagree with (Exxon Valdez). Make something up on the spur of the moment, the joy that the children had when they got their favorite presents, the joy that you had when you got your favorite present-- wait-- that's too commercial-- your favorite memory is going to church for Midnight Mass, isn't it. Does you church have Midnight Mass, or is that another gotcha question?

Todd's second question was also a gotcha question because Sarah never did share her recipe for her moose chili, the only thing that she will really brag about. (Sarah, I saw the commercial package of moose meat on her stove in the Juanita cookie video. I think that you must open a can of chili-and-beans and add the moose meat, but I don't want to steal your recipe for inorganic self-harvested moose meat chili). For a planned phone call where no one can see the notes that Sarah reads from, she was totally unprepared for even that short phoned in appearance. Since it was a church, I guess that they don't pay very much.

Warning: After watching Todd, the Gaydar goes off the chart and you may have to reset it.


Fox Radio Host Todd Starnes Says Chick-fil-A Is the ‘Official Chicken of Jesus’ - Recipes

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

The King James Version is a translation named after King James I of England, who first commissioned the new English Bible translation in 1604 A.D. and later completed in 1611 A.D. King James 'authorized' the new translation to be read in churches in England and beyond. Later known as the 'Authorized Version' in 1814, the King James Version became a standard among English-speaking Christians.

The King James Version is considered one of the most accurate English translations in existence today. A skilled committee of 54 translators worked for 7 years to carefully complete the King James translation.

The translation is most noted for its poetic feel - prose that seems to flow with a certain rhythmic quality. The book is often cited as the most published book in world history with a significant influence on literature and culture in the last few centuries. It is estimated that more than 1 billion copies of the King James Version have been published.

The King James Version has had a few rounds of edits, mostly to keep up with changes in the English language itself. The English from the original 1611 version is noticeably different than the newer 1769 version. People who are unfamiliar with the English language in the Elizabethan and Jacobean era can easily mistake the 1611 King James Version writing style for spelling errors. The same can be said for other writings of that era as well, for example Beowulf. It is widely recognized that the King James Version has made a significant impact on the English language and it continues to leave impressions on people and culture, as one of the most published books in world history.